Home: Maucher Jenkins

Intellectual Property

Patents | Trade Marks | Designs

新闻与事件

新闻活动

Robyn Rihanna Fenty & Ors v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) & Anor

日期: 31 July 2013

EmailTwitterLinkedInXingWeChat

Earlier this week the English High Court handed down judgment in a passing off case brought by Rihanna against a major clothing retailer, Topshop. The case concerned the sale of unauthorised tank tops bearing an image of Rihanna taken from her 2011 single, "We Found Love". Neither the shirts nor the tags suggested the tops were official merchandise, but equally there was no indication they were not. The supplier of the shirts (who notably indemnified Topshop in the action) had a copyright license from the supplier of the artwork, but not from Rihanna. Nevertheless, no copyright isses arose in the case, which was solely concerned with passing off.

 

The judge concluded that Topshop was indeed passing off the shirts as official merchandise. Rihanna's fans would recognise the image from the video shoot for her single and associate it with publicity and marketing for her album. Rihanna was a "style icon" and Topshop was a leading fashion retailer which had publicly associated itself in the past with various celebrities, including Rihanna, in promotions and competitions. To Rihanna's fans, her endorsement of a fashion garment was important, and on the facts the judge was satisfied that some customers would be deceived into buying the shirts because they thought they were authorised, even though there was no evidence of confusion.

 

This case is important because it shows how passing off can enhance, or even stand in for, a copyright claim to protect official licensees and merchandising revenue streams. Passing off is highly fact dependent, but where an image from a film or publicity shoot appears on a garment there may well be an expectation that it is authorised promotional merchandise. Where the facts establish that, there may be no need for evidence of actual confusion for the claim to prevail.

 

This decision of course concerns the UK, but the findings may well assist in similar unfair competition actions brought elsewhere in the EU, such as in Germany, where our other major offices are based.

 

In case you wish to read it, you can access a copy here:



Wednesday, July 31, 2013

C
本网站使用cookies。

其中一些cookies是必要的,而另一些cookies则通过分析网站的使用方式来帮助我们改善您的用户体验。有关我们使用的cookies的更多详细信息,请查看我们的隐私政策

必要的Cookies

必要的cookies可实现网站核心功能。 没有这些cookies,网站将无法正常运行。这些cookies只能通过更改浏览器选项来禁用。

分析性Cookies

分析性cookies通过收集和报告使用信息帮助我们改进网站。

x