Home: Maucher Jenkins

Intellectual Property

Patents | Trade Marks | Designs

新闻与事件

新闻活动

"Dictated by Technical Character" Defence fails before Court in Brussels

日期: 16 May 2018

EmailTwitterLinkedInXingWeChat

By Hugh Dunlop

 

Before the CJEU gave its ruling in Doceram v Ceramtech, the Brussels commercial court was faced with an invalidity defence based on Article 8(1) CDR (“solely dictated by technical character”) in relation to assertion by Koninklijke Philips of design rights relevant to its AirfryerTM product (shown on the left) against the marketing of a competitor product (shown on the right). (Case reference A/17/0079)

 

Decision

 

The court dismissed the invalidity counterclaim.

 

It is up to the defendant to prove that a feature is solely dictated by its function and in this case the defendant failed to meet that burden of proof.

 

The defendant made reference to a patent for the internal technical structure of the Philips product and argued that the external shape was dictated by the internal technical structure.

 

The court found that, although heat circulation and other technical factors played a role, the external design did not coincide with the internal structure and Philips enjoyed a substantial degree of freedom in the developing of the design.

 

Nothing in the later CJEU decision would have changed this finding, because the Brussels court held that the determining factors in the Philips designs where aesthetic considerations.

 

 

 

 

 

C
本网站使用cookies。

其中一些cookies是必要的,而另一些cookies则通过分析网站的使用方式来帮助我们改善您的用户体验。有关我们使用的cookies的更多详细信息,请查看我们的隐私政策

必要的Cookies

必要的cookies可实现网站核心功能。 没有这些cookies,网站将无法正常运行。这些cookies只能通过更改浏览器选项来禁用。

分析性Cookies

分析性cookies通过收集和报告使用信息帮助我们改进网站。

x