Janet 获得了生物化学的一等荣誉学士学位，随后获得了生物技术和生物科学研究学会（BBSRC）的博士培训账户学生奖学金，继续其博士学习。

 

做为Janet博士学位的一部分，她在细胞致瘤和非致瘤的腺病毒的细胞转换的基因表达不同方面做了研究，并且鉴别了以便进一步研究生物化学机制。在做博士期间，她同时承担一项知识产权和专利的介绍模块任务。

 

随后，她从事科学教学并获得了知识产权管理学硕士学位。她一直在专业的主流中，这使她能参加两项额外的考试（CITMA 商标法，CIPA专利法），以便获得知识产权法的硕士证书。她同时被授予了(EIPIN)的荣誉证书，因为她参加了在荷兰马斯特里赫特大学举办的欧洲知识产权研究院网络会议（EIPIN），法国斯特拉斯堡欧洲人权法院及迈尔森人类科学-阿尔萨斯（MISHA） 会议，并与荷兰马斯特里赫特大学、西班牙阿利坎特、法国斯特拉斯堡大学的国际学生一起撰写人权与知识产权法关系的报告。

 

Janet曾在国际律师事务所知识产权部门做过助理, 并在法律咨询公司做过实习生。在此期间，她就建立起了商标、版权、设计和专利法的相关知识体系。这些拓展了她在批判性分析及知识产权问题探讨上的经验。她喜欢交流思想，并且独著及合著有大量的文章，包括法律发展类的文章、科学研究类的文章及其博士论文。

 

她同时获得了应用学生物化学英国城市行业协会奖（于先正达工业年获得该奖，并获得理学学士学位）

 

出版物:

 

'Policy Shapes the Law as Court of Appeal Considers KitKat'. Fox, A. and Strath, J. (2017). Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice (in press). [Publisher Abstract]

'Unwired Planet v Huawei: The FRAND Injunction'. Cross, J. and Strath, J. (2017) Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 178-180 (in press).

 

'Royal Mint fails to win gold as SOVEREIGN trade mark falls short'. Strath, J. and Fox, A. (2017). Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 541-543. 

 

'Humira patent rights shot by "Fujifilm declaration'. Kunst, M. and Strath, J. (2017). European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 518-524.

'Fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms: can the court set a FRAND rate?', Cross, J. and Strath, J. (2017). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 112-115. 

'Family of marks cannot save Apple as iWatch application fails'. Fox, A., Webster, M., and Strath, J. (2017). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 120-122.

'Lyrica decision upheld by Court of Appeal'. Thompson, C. and Strath, J. (2017). Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 158-160.

 

'Keywords plunge bidders into hot water, but is "honest concurrent use" a watertight defence?', Strath, J. and Ravenscroft, L. (2017). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 44-47. 

'Common general knowledge and the importance of being plausible: Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc v Gilead Sciences Inc'. Hutchinson, A. and Strath, J. (2017). European Intellectual Property Review, vol.39, no. 3, pp. 185-190. 

'UK Patents Court confirms a dosage regimen can be considered inventive, even if it would have been obvious from the prior art to conduct a clinical trial'. Strath, J. (2017). European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 49-53. 

'Revocation of Cubist patents for obviousness: strictly the same invention?', Hutchinson, A. and Strath, J. (2016). European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 638-644.

'FRANDly competition: a partial win for Samsung'. Heaney, M. and Strath, J. (2016). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 144-146.

'Lost in conversion: Unwired Planet and Huawei and Samsung'. Heaney, M. and Strath, J. (2016). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 94-97.

'Wait 'til the midnight hour: that's when prior art comes tumbling down'. Heaney, M. and Strath, J. (2016). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 76-78.

'Rovi v Virgin: a box of delights that needed trying'. Strath, J. (2015). Entertainment Law Review, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 302-305. 

 

'Technically unpatentable: invention fails to bring more to the party than the software alone'. Strath, J. (2015). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 21-23. 

 

'Philips v Nintendo: irre-console-able differences mean Wii have a problem'. Strath, J (2015). Entertainment Law Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25-29.

 

'Smartphone patent wars: European Commission adopts anti-trust decisions on enforcement by Motorola and Samsung of standard essential patents'. Strath, J (2014). Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 127-129.

 

'What makes someone a de facto director?', Strath J, Harris P (2014), Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 447-448.

 

'Courts have no general power of review over EPO grant procedure decisions'. Strath J, Harris P (2014), Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 349-351. 

 

'HTC v Nokia: a brief comparison of UK and US exhaustion/first sale doctrines'. Harris P, Strath J (2014), European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 266-271.

 

'Cartoon Network's BOOMERANG trade mark thrown out by General Court for likelihood of confusion'. Strath, J (2014), Entertainment Law Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 24-26.

 

'You've got unpatentable subject matter: Lantana Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks'. Strath, J (2013), Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 223-225.

 

'Don't Say it with AdWords: Interflora Inc v Marks & Spencer Plc'. Hetherington L, Strath J (2013), Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, no. 5, pp. 25-28. 

 

'AETN v Discovery - a bold claim consigned to history?', Strath, J (2013), Entertainment Law Review, vol. 24, no.3, pp. 98-100. 

 

'Identification of genes differentially expressed as result of adenovirus type 5- and adenovirus type 12-transformation'. Strath J, Georgopoulos LJ, Kellam P, Blair GE (2009), BMC Genomics, vol. 10:67. 

 

'Adenovirus subversion of immune surveillance, apoptotic and growth regulatory pathways: a model for tumorigenesis'. Strath J, Blair GE (2006), Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 145-169.